Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Sob City: Clippers Swept By Spurs

SB Nation Nate's Take

Has UFC Hit An Inflection Point?

SAN JOSE, CA - NOVEMBER 19: UFC President Dana White attends the UFC 139 post-fight press conference at the HP Pavilion on November 19, 2011 in San Jose, California. (Photo by Josh Hedges/Zuffa LLC/Zuffa LLC via Getty Images).

Three recent events indicate that the UFC has reached an inflection point in their business cycle: the decision to cancel UFC 145 in Montreal; the decision to test new UFC fighters for PEDs before signing them; and the UFC's continued stubborn advocacy of SOPA even after it failed.

Jan 24, 2012 - Its obvious that the UFC has entered a new phase of its history with the move from Spike TV to Fox/FX/Fuel and the loss of their two biggest pay-per-view draws Brock Lesnar and welterweight champ Georges St. Pierre. This is a critical phase in which the trajectory of the business for the next 18 months to 3 years will be determined.

Three unrelated events over the last week have made me suspect that the UFC might have hit an "inflection point" in the life of their business. For those of you who didn't take calculus, an "inflection point" is the point on a curve where it changes direction. For a fight promotion like the UFC an inflection point is a critical point in time that determines whether the next phase of the business will be one of growth, stagnation or decline.

Inflection-point-587_medium

The recent three events that may hint at the direction of the UFC's fortunes in the near term were:

  1. The decision to cancel the planned March 24 UFC 145 pay-per-view from Montreal
    While its a retreat, it's the most positive sign of all. This is the first time ever that the UFC has cancelled or postponed an already announced (pay-per-view) PPV. Since at least UFC 108 when the planned Rashad Evans vs. Quinton Jackson headliner was replaced by Evans vs. Thiago Silva, the promotion has pressed forward with numerous weak events after losing their planned headliner.

    This is a classic case of swallowing their pride and doing the right thing for the business. After a three-year period in which even the weakest UFC sold 350,000+ PPV buys, the UFC's string of weak headliners in 2010 and 2011 saw their base fall to just over 200,000 PPVs.

  2. The decision to begin testing fighters for performance enhancing drugs (PED)
    The UFC has long relied on a strategy of pushing any responsibility for testing MMA fighters onto the athletic commissions of the states in which they compete. UFC President Dana White has often publicly commented to the effect that MMA is one of the most toughly regulated sports for PEDs due to the testing by athletic commissions. The fact that the UFC has long done its own testing in jurisdictions like Texas, Australia and England with little or no public regulation went unmentioned.

    The recent announcement that the UFC will now test new fighters for PEDs before signing them is a long-overdue admission that there is too much to be done to clean up the sport to leave it to the athletic commissions. This willingness to confront PED use by fighters directly is a sign of a maturing business that's willing to confront difficulties before they explode.

  3. The decision of the UFC to continue to publicly endorse SOPA after the failure of the legislation
    Of course for every two steps forward, there's a big step back. The UFC has long supported the movie and recording industries in their lobbying efforts to crack down on Internet piracy. That's understandable since they believe that illegal streaming of their PPVs is seriously hurting their business. Unfortunately they supported the recent SOPA/PIPA legislation and continued to publicly do so after the bills were withdrawn in the aftermath of a massive online protest led by leading websites such as Reddit, Google and Wikipedia. UFC executive VP Lawrence Epstein wrote an op-ed in the Las Vegas Review Journal last Sunday continuing to advocate for the already defeated bills. I have to wonder what their strategy was in advocating for hugely unpopular legislation that had already been defeated.Regardless of their intentions, the result was that they came to the attention of a number of hackers who brought down UFC.com for much of Sunday. Even more ominously, online responses to the op-ed indicate that this is one issue where the UFC does not have the support of their fan base.

All-in-all these moves reflect an organization that is making moves to attack serious issues that present long-term threats to their business. Only time will tell if these are the right moves. Luke Thomas and I will discuss these points in our next video chat so put your thoughts and questions in the comments and we'll respond.

Do you like this post?

Img_5957_medium

Nate Wilcox

MMA Editor

Nate Wilcox is the editor of MMA Nation and SB Nation's BloodyElbow.com.


Comments

Display:

Yeah, the SOPA and PIPA move was not wise at all. The last thing they should do is venture into political issues, especially immensely unpopular ones.

"He's got a great package... and an unusual one!" Joe Rogan (of Lyoto Machida)

by crizzy on Jan 24, 2012 10:22 AM PST reply actions  

I don’t think it’s a real inflection point. Things are down from the heights of Brockamania, but he was an outlier. They are still pushing forward and making money.

Mid 2011 to mid 2012 has and will suck. The 2 biggest draws spent most of that time sick, injured, and now retired. The first half was with an unwilling/jilted TV partner on the way out and now they are with a new, better tv partner that is getting their feet wet.

I’m not sure if they’ll ever hit 1.5 million buys on a single card again, but I don’t see why they will start moving forward again once they get things settled with Fox.

by Phildo on Jan 24, 2012 10:25 AM PST reply actions  

Great to see another of those videos.

But I guess it will be the last video with The Bearded One?

"No man dies for what he knows to be true. Men die for what they want to be true, for what some terror in their hearts tells them is not true."

by killphil on Jan 24, 2012 10:43 AM PST reply actions  

No

Luke’s not leaving SBNation, just 106.7 THE FAN.

Follow me on Twitter @KidNate

by Nate Wilcox on Jan 24, 2012 10:51 AM PST up reply actions  

Hey Luke, is there any way that the audio from the callers could be implemented into the radio show videos? It’s so hard to follow what’s going on when I can’t hear what people are saying to you.

I would have a horseshoe surgically implanted in my ass just so Brock would pull it out and beat me over the head with it while I pleasure myself.

PS: Melvin and I say: Please visit the
Daniel James Miller Foundation and donate.

by Machiel Van on Jan 24, 2012 12:11 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

I think your explanation of mathematical inflection points is off,

it isn’t where curves change direction (that’s everywhere on a curve!), but where a curve changes from being concave to concave , or vice versa. (Other mathematical definitions abound, but come to basically the same thing.)

I smoke on the mic like Smokin' Joe Frazier

by jhf884 on Jan 24, 2012 10:52 AM PST reply actions  

yeah

you’re technically correct but I don’t think that definition would mean anything to my audience.

Follow me on Twitter @KidNate

by Nate Wilcox on Jan 24, 2012 10:55 AM PST up reply actions  

Ouch.

I would have a horseshoe surgically implanted in my ass just so Brock would pull it out and beat me over the head with it while I pleasure myself.

PS: Melvin and I say: Please visit the
Daniel James Miller Foundation and donate.

by Machiel Van on Jan 24, 2012 12:09 PM PST up reply actions  

fair enough!

I smoke on the mic like Smokin' Joe Frazier

by jhf884 on Jan 24, 2012 2:56 PM PST up reply actions  

“How to alienate readers and demean your bloggers”-by Nate Wilcox.

Show no mercy; for you shall receive none

by Chorongota on Jan 24, 2012 9:21 PM PST up reply actions  

Another data point I would mention is the Salt Lake City show that moved to San Diego.

It was the first time the UFC struggled so badly to sell tickets that they moved an event to another city. At the time I don’t think many people thought that was a big deal because that show was sandwiched between Lesnar-Carwin and Silva-Sonnen, and those big events overshadowed the little stumble in Salt Lake City. But that was an indication that the UFC was finding it couldn’t just announce any show in any city and assume sales would be great. I thought at the time it was an indication that the UFC was at a plateau, and a year and a half later I still think that.

by MichaelDavidSmith on Jan 24, 2012 11:20 AM PST reply actions   2 recs

well, in the original graph, it would only be an inflection point if business picks up… if business slows down, then concavity isn’t changed.

…we’ll stop being nerds now. good article

by phantasma475 on Jan 24, 2012 11:20 AM PST reply actions  

Why would SOPA support

influence anything in the big business model picture? I think its a very minor point that will not affect the business. The next 6 months will be great indicator to see if the unbelievable exposure that we are now witnessing like the fights FUEL, FX and FOX fights, big marketing push on FOX big shows like American Idol. Will all these generate more PPV which is the UFC’s bread and butter?. Will the FX and Fuel shows surpass Spike and will the FOX shows will be so strong as to attract the big sponsors?. I think fuck yes. If the UFC was to go public I would buy as many shares as I can.

by Coeman on Jan 24, 2012 2:08 PM PST reply actions  

the relevance of the SOPA point IMO is this

it’s the first time I can recall seeing Dana White’s audience turn on him and they’re doing it over one of the central pillars of the UFC’s public affairs strategy. They seem to be convinced that piracy is one of the chief reasons for the downturn in PPV sales. That tells me they won’t let this go. If that alienates their fans it could be a harbinger of a bigger split to come.

Follow me on Twitter @KidNate

by Nate Wilcox on Jan 24, 2012 2:44 PM PST up reply actions  

I really doubt

this will alienate any significant amount that will effect the business. The precedent is Metallica who went head to head with Napster which was at the time a huge deal. Metallica fans didn’t abandon the group and stopped going to their concerts. Some people hated them for it but the majority really didn’t care and kept buying from iTunes which came right about that time or kept illegally downloading it.

by Coeman on Jan 24, 2012 3:02 PM PST up reply actions  

The folks online, who actually know, or care about this != Dana's audience.

I doubt the majority of Dana’s audience knows anything about the issue at all, let alone the UFC’s stance on the matter.

I smoke on the mic like Smokin' Joe Frazier

by jhf884 on Jan 24, 2012 3:14 PM PST up reply actions  

The biggest inflection point is clearly the Fox deal

With overall PPV sales declining despite an increase in the number of PPV events, and with the stated goal of becoming the equivalent of the other major sporting organizations, the UFC should be looking at how they are going to move away from their current business strategy which is focused almost entirely on PPV sales.

PPV sales will always be the UFC’s bread and butter, but they should be exploring ways to make up for lost PPV revenue with increased cable revenue. Free, televised fights should draw more eyeballs, and lead to the UFC running fewer PPV cards with greater sales per card. If at the end of the Fox deal this transition isn’t far along then the UFC is in big trouble.

by MS_Dos_Santos on Jan 24, 2012 2:18 PM PST reply actions  

When’s the video chat happening on this?

(one of) NED STARK'S BASTARDS

http://www.couturierillustration.com

by Jeremy Couturier on Jan 24, 2012 2:46 PM PST reply actions  

should be up tomorrow

already recorded it.

Follow me on Twitter @KidNate

by Nate Wilcox on Jan 24, 2012 6:13 PM PST up reply actions  

Its pretty clear to me

That the Zuffa runs the UFC on a growth basis, not a profit basis. That are trying to build and maintain a bigger and bigger fan base and are willing to take short term profitability hits for long term viability.
Its the right decision.

Cecil People's Champs
Still the head conductor of the Charles Oliveira hype train.

by Stiff Jab on Jan 24, 2012 4:18 PM PST reply actions  

that's an interesting analysis

could very well be right. But they’re also taking out a big % of the profits to pay Lorenzo, Dana and Frank.

Follow me on Twitter @KidNate

by Nate Wilcox on Jan 24, 2012 6:14 PM PST up reply actions  

I mean purely in strategy, not reinvestment

They are trying to balance a line, because they want to maintain the “culture of paying” that combat sports fans have. If they get used to title fights on free tv they won’t get used to paying for them basically. That is why they don’t just turn Aldo/Mendes into a free card.

I think in the long term the multi-platform fox strategy will be used to build up super cards, but I think we are years away.

Cecil People's Champs
Still the head conductor of the Charles Oliveira hype train.

by Stiff Jab on Jan 24, 2012 6:21 PM PST up reply actions  

Not clear on why

canceling UFC 145 is a positive sign.

When a singer or band cancels a bunch of dates because they can’t sell tickets, no one considers that a positive sign. Its usually a sign the band/singer is in deep shit.

This reminds me of the scene in Spinal Tap where the manager had to tell the band they had to cancel the Boston gig.

Nate Wilcox: They had to cancel UFC 145.
Fans: What?
Nate: I wouldn’t worry about it, Montreal isn’t a big MMA town.

by Ironbuddha on Jan 24, 2012 4:23 PM PST reply actions  

well

IMO its better to cancel a show without a headliner than press on and try to fob off a subpar card on the local and PPV audiences — WHICH IS WHAT THEY’VE BEEN DOING FOR THE LAST TWO YEARS. Hopefully the willingness to cancel a weak card is a sign that they’re through eroding their customer base.

Follow me on Twitter @KidNate

by Nate Wilcox on Jan 24, 2012 6:15 PM PST up reply actions  

obviously

it would’ve been better to have put together a fight featuring Jon Jones and I’m pretty baffled why they didn’t just book Jones vs Henderson and be done with it.
Nevertheless, IMO cancelling the card once they didn’t have a headliner is an indication that they’re at least a little clued in to reality and are willing to adapt to changing circumstances.

Follow me on Twitter @KidNate

by Nate Wilcox on Jan 24, 2012 6:17 PM PST up reply actions  

Do we know if that is the reason?

I thought it was a scheduling issue with Montreal specifically.

Cecil People's Champs
Still the head conductor of the Charles Oliveira hype train.

by Stiff Jab on Jan 24, 2012 6:22 PM PST up reply actions  

no

they had the arena and the date locked in. they won’t be able to return soon after that date because of conflicts with ice hockey but the March 24 date was theirs.

Follow me on Twitter @KidNate

by Nate Wilcox on Jan 24, 2012 8:01 PM PST up reply actions  

That's a long month

of March without any PPVs. I think they’re trying to go about the right way in trying to workout that balance between free content and paid content.

by HipHopJunkie44 on Feb 7, 2012 11:11 AM PST up reply actions  

A good business man

should always assume his business is @ a inflection point. As it was mentioned the business has the potential to go one of three ways…I am very optimistic about the future of the UFC.
How many young stars will fill the starpower void going into 2012 with the help of Fuel, FX & Fox…especially with all the replays? By young, I mean under 30…JDS, Jose Aldo, Jon Jones & Frankie Edgar.
Lesnar-34,Sonnen-34,Silva-37,Carwin-36,Henderson-41…these guys are out or on their way out or about to suffer defeat.
Anybody see the Undisputed 3 demo yet? The Pride version is two guys past their MMA prime & the UFC version features Jones vs Silva…this is how you promote fights in this day & age.
We will see this fight sooner than later…bet! And in this process a torch is passed in a Super Fight & win or lose…Jon Jones star will become brighter in a company that is already thinking out the box with a 3D version of UFC 143 available @ AMC theaters…pirate that sh#t.
The company is gonna go higher, reguardless of SOPA, PIPA, & banned gun sponsers.

by fallenidol2012 on Jan 25, 2012 12:29 AM PST via Android app reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed

Photo by Esther Lin for MMA Fighting.

Complete SBNation Coverage of UFC 143

Alistair Overeem

Alistair Overeem Reportedly Charged With Misdemeanor Battery

Photo

UFC On Fox 3 Fight Card: Tony Ferguson Vs. Dennis Hallman Tapped For May